26 Comments
User's avatar
Khalid A.'s avatar

This was a very well written thesis, one could even say it's a model thesis. I enjoyed reading it highly. Credit Bureau Asia should definitely be monitored in the future.

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Thank you so much Khalid!

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Stupid question: help me understand Credit bureaus valuation at the moment. So looking backwards now 2024 FCF was 29,2 million. EV is 266,33 million. Almost 11% yield?

Still it has only 3% divident yield with 82% payout. Do you think the yield is wrong or do you think its realistic to assume that all the (fcf)yield would be paid as a divident in the future? Thanks !

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Hey Andy, thanks for the question. The $29M you mentioned is pre-minorities. I think their normalized FCF last year was just above $12M (post-intangibles, lease payments, and using normalized taxes), which gives a FCF yield of around 4.7% on their current EV (ex-leases).

Yes, I believe all FCF will eventually go toward dividends and/or buybacks. Last year, they generated $0.53 in normalized FCFPS and $0.41 in EPS (after minorities), paying out a $0.40 dividend—so a 76% payout on FCF and 97% on net income. They also recently announced a 10% buyback, bringing total shareholder returns closer to the 100%+ payout levels they've historically maintained.

Using the same valuation approach from my write-up, I still think there's a potential 9–15% IRR potential from here. That said, the stock has become more expensive, and trading at 20x+FCF leaves some short-term downside risk if growth falls short and the multiple compresses.

I’m still holding half of my original position as it's the highest-quality micro-cap I know and provides uncorrelated exposure to the broader market.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Thanks a lot, makes sense now! Finchat does not take into account minorities automatically. Awesome writeup 👍👍👍

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Matt Newell's avatar

Fascinating idea. One note - if you're assuming that FCF will be immediately paid out as a dividend, doesn't it make sense to multiply the FCF yield by 1 - (whatever tax rate you will pay)?

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Thank you! It would make sense indeed, however, each individual handles taxes differently and/or pays a different %. So I shied away from doing that and let people do it for themselves haha

Expand full comment
Matt Newell's avatar

Yep, fair enough - perhaps I would add a little note just mentioning that :)

It is interesting how in DCFs in general, no one seems to account for taxes on dividends though. At least not in the ones I see.

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Fair, though it gets tricky if you present a case and do that. One could also argue that you need to incorporate a capital gains tax calculation as well. In my case, I'm paying a flat 12% on divvys and 0% on capital gains if I hold it for 2+ years.

Expand full comment
Samuel Lau's avatar

Thank you for the note. Any idea why this kind of business will go public during 2020?

What is the purpose of the proceeds?

Separately, the expansion to China is not going to work, because the credit data business is owned by internet giant like Ant Financial under Alibaba. Credit card is non-existent in China.

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Thank you

Tbh I don't have enough info on their China plans to have an opinion. You might be right or they just might be taking a different angle to it.

According to the prospectus, the purpose of proceeds was mostly for inorganic growth and software/infrastructure development. Though I'm sure they could have do that without it. So I think a more likely explanation is that insiders wanted to cash out some, or that they wanted gain more credibility in the financial sector by going public.

Expand full comment
Samuel Lau's avatar

Thank you David. Experian is deemed as a good business, at least by compounder bros, but share price is just doing alright the past few years , probably due to high multiple ?

Any catalyst you think credit bureau share price should go up ? Think it already trades at a premium vs the index. The growth seems to be dependent on m&a which is a big question mark.

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

No problem.

Rate cuts and no, I don't think growth is dependent on M&A, as it can be seen in historical financials

Expand full comment
Samuel Lau's avatar

But we are also paying a high multiple.

I just think if I were the owner, if someone want to cash out, can easily use the cash on balance sheet to buy them out. If want to do m and a, can levered up the bs.

Why give people I don’t know a chance to share my wealth ?

Expand full comment
Samuel Lau's avatar

But thank you for the great analysis

Expand full comment
Jacques le Roux's avatar

Hi David. Fantastic find and great write-up! Always enjoy reading your stuff.

Do you mind helping me understand the difference between the Global Credit Risk Management (GCRM) business (where Experian has 57% share) and the Commercial Credit Bureau segment (both in non-FI)? I'm unclear how Experian is able to compete in GCRM if CBA has all of the commercial credit data as the holder of the sole Singapore license.

Secondly, how do you think this plays out over the longer-term with the founders? If they were to retire (or pass away) then are they allowed to sell their equity and would that not be a catalyst for the share price to rerate since the free float would be larger allowing bigger stakes by the funds?

Expand full comment
AncientSion's avatar

Compounder Bro

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

😤

Expand full comment
Max232's avatar

Thanks David for this high quality writeup! :)

What I want to adress is the incredible high Employment Turnover Rate of 33% and the their average target for training per employee of (at least) an 3.80 hours. That indicates a pretty bad working environment (given my middle european background)! How do you judge this numbers?

Expand full comment
Student's avatar

So this bump in volume on September 30 is you 😁

Rounding here for simplicity's sake:

- EPS 0.05

- Price 1.00

- P/E 20

- 100% payout ratio

Assuming it grows at 7%, because it is easier to calculate, it will double in 10 years, and:

- EPS 0.10 -> Price 2 -> Total return 2.75 or ~10.5% per year (at 7% growth and no multiple expansion)

Is this about right?

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

Hope not haha but think so. I provided my calculations on this in the article

Expand full comment
Kalide Endale's avatar

What platform did you use to buy?

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

IBKR

Expand full comment
António Ferreira's avatar

Can you speak more about the friend you have that interviewed management and didn't get impressed?

Expand full comment
David Katunarić's avatar

I don't have more useful info to share on that front, sorry

Expand full comment