10 Comments
Sep 7Liked by David Katunarić

Great insights to the company. FYI there are 3 other write-ups on the name that each have a similar thesis overall, but with each one in its own flavor (and more condensed):

https://roguefunds.substack.com/p/mitchell-services-is-a-potential-4-bagger-hidden-by-a-tax-write-off-scheme

https://valueinvestorsclub.com/idea/Mitchell_Services_Ltd/2377650240

https://overandunder.substack.com/p/mitchell-services-msv

Cheers

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, Osten!

I read both Adrian's and Jacob's write-up. Great work by both of them!

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by David Katunarić

Nit: Other expenses was actually $7M in FY24 ($5.4M in FY23). Let us know if you get an answer from them next week regarding this :)

Expand full comment
author

You're right. My bad, I switched the two!

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by David Katunarić

Great write-up, thank you!

Looking forward to your comments on your meeting with management.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Simon! I'll definitely be sharing them

Expand full comment

Could you provide a FCF reconciliation or details on how you calculated the FCF? Also, apologies if I missed it but do you think current capex approximates maintenance capex? I see depreciation that's a ton more than CapEx and I'm trying to understand that.

Expand full comment
author

I think it's well explained in the article why D&A is temporarily much higher than maintenance capex and the reconciliation is done below. What else can I help with?

Current capex doesn't approximate maintenance capex but it's very close to it in FY2024. The only growth capex purchase they have done last year was LF160 rig that will be used for their decarbonisation efforts

Expand full comment

Loved this writeup! Very well done!

Expand full comment
author

I'm glad you enjoyed it Sven! Thanks

Expand full comment